Of the facts charged in the instant case, the sentence against the Defendant shall be exempted, and the insulting part shall be insulting.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highly 97] Defendant is dissatisfied with the complaint for the reason that he arrested himself as a crime of insult at the Southern Police Station around 2012, and there is an excessive symptoms.

피고인은 2014. 1. 23. 21:10경 술에 취하여 8년 전부터 경찰이 자신을 감시한다는 생각을 하고는 그 이유를 묻기 위해 전남 해남군 해남읍 영빈리 61길에 있는 해남경찰서를 방문하였으나 현관문이 잠겨 있자 “이 씨발 놈들아, 나 집어 넣어라 씹할 놈, 좆같은 새끼들아”라고 욕설을 하면서 오른 발로 수회에 걸쳐 현관 강화유리문을 걷어 찼고, 당직 경찰관들이 제지시켜 경찰서 밖으로 퇴거 조치되었다.

On January 23, 2014, on the ground that police officers forced to enter the police station around 21:50 on January 23, 2014, the Defendant 10 minutes obstructed the police station guard service of the victim C(21 years of age) by putting the door of the police station several times in hand and resulting in a very rough and disorderly speech and behavior in a rough and disorderly manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Selection of fines;

1. The portion of dismissing the prosecution of the instant crime under Article 5 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the Defendant’s promise not to commit such a crime from around the last half of 2014 is well committed, and the instant crime is the previous crime, and the Defendant’s health condition, circumstances, etc. are hedged)

1. [2015 did not go against the Defendant’s disturbance] Around August 6, 2014, the Defendant 17:15 of the facts charged led to the disturbance that, without any reason, he was going to a chemical force inside the intersection of the two-year comprehensive terminal intersection, south-Namnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, the police officers, the prosecution, the court, and the court will not move to the police officers.”

Accordingly, the victim E and F, who are police officers of the D District District, find the defendant during the 112 patrol duty, and "one person."