(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.12.19 2013고단6885

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.12.19 2013고단6885

재물손괴등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2013, around 22:55, the Defendant passed the main point of the "C" located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and found the victim D (the age of 60) who drinks alcohol at that place, and changed the value of the foreign currency, but it was defective that "the victim would deposit his/her account number in the notice of the account number," but the victim's cell phone was collected and damaged so that the market value remains unpaid repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs destroying Handphones;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crimes: Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: The dismissal of prosecution pursuant to Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; and

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: “The defendant only passed ahead of the main point of “C” located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon on July 22:55, 2013, and the victim D (60 years of age) desires to flee. As the victim D (60 years of age) desires to flee, he saw the victim’s bomb and spath, leading the victim’s left breath to the victim’s breath, leading the victim’s breath and spath by drinking, and assaulted the victim at once by drinking the victim’s left breath, and it cannot be punished against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal

2. However, according to the records, the victim submitted a written agreement that he/she does not want the punishment of the defendant to this court around December 4, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution against this part is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.01 2016고단2562

-수원지방법원 2015.06.10 2015고정1042

-부산지방법원 2020.02.05 2019고단5786

-대전지방법원 2013.10.25 2013고합333

-제주지방법원 2015.04.03 2014고단1740