logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.10.02 2019고단595
특수상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 9, 2019, the Defendant: (a) on April 23:29, 2019, on the ground that, while talking with the victim D(44 years of age) for drinking alcohol, the victim expressed his/her desire to bitch bitch bitch son; (b) on the ground that he/she laid the bitch son, which is a dangerous object on the table, laid on the table, she laid the bitch, laid down one time to the head of the victim, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as cerebrum, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on orders to provide community service and attend lectures;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [the determination of types] the special injury, repeated injury [the first category] special injury [the special person] - the mitigation element: the mitigation range (including serious efforts to recover damage) or considerable damage, [the scope of the recommended sentence and the recommended sentence] mitigation range, imprisonment for four months to one year [the scope of the recommended sentence revised according to the applicable sentencing guidelines] for one year (the lowest limit of the sentencing range recommended by the sentencing guidelines is inconsistent with the statutory minimum limit of the applicable sentencing range, so the minimum limit of the applicable sentencing range in law is inconsistent with the applicable sentencing range); and

2. The Defendant, who was sentenced to sentence, did not control the victim’s emotions and did not take dangerous measures to control the victim’s appraisal, and was inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as brain-dead, supposed, supposed, and supposed. The fact that the nature of the crime is not less than that of the victim, and that there are a number of criminal records, including three times of criminal punishment due to drunk driving, three times of suspended sentence due to violent crimes, and one time of suspended sentence due to violent crimes, are disadvantageous to

However, the defendant is recognized as committing the crime of this case, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant in consultation with the victim at the investigation stage.

arrow