Text
1. The Defendant each of the KRW 15,014,750 for Plaintiff A and B, KRW 8,626,250 for Plaintiff C and D, and KRW 12,903,00 for Plaintiff E and each of them.
Reasons
(c) shall be.
- G publicly notified G in Daegu Metropolitan City on March 20, 2012, and H-project implementer of July 20, 2012
(b) Decision of expropriation on October 10, 2012 - Division 10, 2013: ① each of the lands under the following located in Daegu-dong-gu I (hereinafter individual land shall be specified as ever), ② Total 39,112,470 won and indirect compensation for resettlement 51, total of 39,112,190 won and resettlement 51, total of 39,12,470 won and 510, total of 39,12,470, 6476, 476, 450 and 640, 30, 249, 30, 30, 476, 476, 450 and 940, 30, 30, 360, 47, 476, 450, 30, 37, 3750, 37, 460, 360, 194
C. The Central Land Tribunal’s rulings on July 18, 2013: (a) the size of the remaining land in the instant case, which was previously incorporated after the subdivision of the owner of the objection filed on July 18, 2013, was 58,453,90 won, and (b) the size of the remaining land in the instant case, which was 78,00 won, J 163 M 685, J 163, K 1023, D L 129 Q 67- 67: ① the compensation for the Plaintiff’s obstacles was 106,974,820 won, the compensation for the Plaintiff’s obstacles was 106,90 won, and the compensation for the Plaintiff’s obstacles was 58,453,990 won, and (c) the Plaintiff’s claim for the compensation for the remaining land depreciation as set forth below was rejected; and (c) the land J, Korea’s land, and the land 1, 2, 3, and 3 residues;