logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.07.18 2018나2056238
유류분 청구의 소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition of each corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 10. The following shall be added to the first page:

Meanwhile, Plaintiff C asserts that the period of extinctive prescription of the right to claim the return of legal reserve of inheritance should be calculated from May 23, 2009, as the deceased’s son’s son did not receive the instant testament certificate around May 23, 2009, which was open. However, in light of the following circumstances, it can be seen that the deceased’s son received a copy of the instant testament certificate on May 23, 2009, and the deceased’s son’s son’s son and the heir’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

arrow