(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.07.22 2015고단2273

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.07.22 2015고단2273

상습절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

A seizured one (Evidence No. 8) shall be forfeited from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Suwon District Court for larceny, and on February 13, 2013, the same court sentenced six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and completed the execution of the sentence in Seoul Southern Prison on October 24, 2013. On December 13, 2013, the same court was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and on May 4, 2015, the same military force is more than two times.

1. Habitual theft;

A. On May 11, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime, around 10:30 on May 11, 2015, on the part of the Defendant: (a) at the victim’s 271 store located in the 271 Sinsan City, the Defendant stolen the victim’s property worth KRW 4,150,000, total market value of KRW 2,150,000.

B. The Defendant committed the crime of May 14, 2015, around 12:20 on May 14, 2015, at the victim Embasan store store located in 181 as the game in Yasan-si, cut a theft prevention strawet attached to the household goods held in advance, and then put it in a bank in a way of packing it. At the same time, the Defendant stolen the victim’s property equivalent to KRW 45,000 of the market price of KRW 67,700 of the market price of KRW 67,00 of the total market price of KRW 7,000,000 of the small amount of KRW 7,00 of the market price of KRW 5,20 of the market price, and the Defendant habitually stolen the victim’s property of KRW 139,00 of the market price.

2. The Defendant interfered with business, at the time, at the place specified in the above-mentioned 1-A (a), took a large amount of voice, “salking to the police,” and returned to the copons in the store, and took a bath to the employees who work in the store, and dumped them to the visitors who visited the place, and obstructed the victim, corporation, by force, from selling goods at the bar bar, the Defendant interfered with the business of selling goods at the bar bar.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

참조조문

-특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2013.12.13 2013고단6258

-수원지방법원 2018.08.14 2018고단3563

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2012.08.10 2012고단524

-춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.07.01 2015고단184

-수원지방법원 2015.04.30 2015고단955