logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.09.09 2015가단104800
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

(b) Appendix 7,800,000 and Appendix 1, 2015.

Reasons

1. Indication of Claim: On September 9, 2013, the Plaintiff leased a building recorded in the attached list to the Defendant as security deposit of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 650,00 (including performance expenses of special agreement), and the lease period of KRW 24 months from November 1, 2013.

The Defendant promised to pay the rent up to September 2014 by telephone communications on July 2014 with the four-time unpaid rents paid by the Defendant, but failed to comply therewith.

On March 2, 2015, the Plaintiff sent a certificate of content to the Defendant and notified the Defendant of the fact of dispatch by telephone, and demanded to deposit the overdue rent between March 2, 2015 and April, 2015. In the event of unpaid rent, the lease contract was terminated and the Defendant was promised to withdraw by himself.

On April 25, 2015, the Plaintiff made a call to confirm the payment performance to the Defendant, but the Defendant was “not to deposit until the deposit is extinguished, and not to leave.”

Until April 30, 2015, 12-month rent of 7.8 million won has been in arrears, and the rent has not been paid thereafter.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff terminated the lease contract by serving a duplicate of the complaint of this case, and sought a delivery of the building indicated in the attached list to the Defendant and a payment of unjust enrichment equivalent to the overdue rent or overdue rent.

2. Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow