Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 911] The Defendant appears to be a clerical error in the facts charged in relation to D Building E in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around December 15, 2016.

F. F. F. F. F. F. F.C. in the Defendant’s residence.

“To deliver money” to the injured party G who has reported and contacted “to deliver transaction goods.”

“.......”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the goods.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 65,00 won in total from the H account (I) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

[2017 High 203]

1. On August 2, 2016, the Defendant connects a computer to “F”, which is a website trading online, at the residence of the Defendant located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, by means of a computer, and sells the computer camera at KRW 85,000.

“The” posts a letter and communicates it to the victim J who has reported and contacted it, “The delivery of traded goods will be made if the proceeds of the goods are sent first.”

“A false statement” was made.

However, even if the defendant receives the price for the goods from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the goods.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 85,00 to the H account under the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim.

2. 피고인은 2016. 8. 3. 경 위 피고인의 주거지에서 위와 같은 방법으로 “ 아이 팟을 103,000원에 판매한다.

“The” posts a letter to the victim K, which reported it, will deliver the transaction goods to the victim K first if the proceeds of the goods are sent.

“A false statement” was made.

However, even if the defendant receives the price for the goods from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the goods.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.