beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Summary of Evidence
[2013 high-level 2643] The Defendant, along with B and C on February 8, 2010 from around 23:10 to 23:45 of the same day, used trum card 52 in E-real estate office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and used trum card 52 to divide each of the following numbers by 7: the number is the same as the same card or pattern, or the number of the cards in hand was discarded to the floor when the game ends, or the sum of the number of the cards in hand was the smaller, and the winner was a hulululule so long as he/she took part in several times by giving 2,00 to the winners.
[2013Gohap2644] The Defendant, along with F, G, and H, ranging from around 23:30 on November 3, 2009 to the next 01:00 on the following day, she saw each of the first 1,00 won using Trum cards in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I Apartment 101 Dong 102 and 102, distributed the card 4, and then distributed the card 1,000 won in a manner that he saw up to half of each market value every time he alters the card.
Summary of Evidence
[2013 High Court Decision 2643]
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning B and C;
1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure [2013, 2644]
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused (including the F, G, H, and J’s statement);
1. Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 246 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The summary of the charge of assault (wholly amended by Presidential Decree No. 2013Da26444, Nov. 4, 2009) among the charges of this case, the dismissed part of the indictment under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, is that the Defendant assaulted the victim’s grandchildren during the dispute with the victim G (Seoul Seocho-gu I Apartment 101 Dong 102, Oct. 4, 2009).
However, this is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Code.