1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is registered as a constructor under the Framework Act on the Construction Industry as a company that engages in construction, civil engineering, landscaping, etc.

The defendant is a person who operates the architectural design office and has a long-term relationship with C as the chairperson of the plaintiff.

B. The instant construction contract under the Plaintiff’s name 1) F is the Korea Non-U.S. E (hereinafter “E”).

(E) “Construction of New E Living and Lodging Facilities” (hereinafter “instant Construction”) for the purpose of constructing and operating accommodation facilities after a long-term lease of the said three parcels outside G in the net City of 1,000.

(2) Around May 2013, H entered into a contract for the instant construction project under the Plaintiff’s name with F (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) and entered into the contract as “H” in the contractor column.

C. On June 1, 2013, the Defendant issued a letter of instant construction contract to Skman C, and C created the name of H stating H as the Plaintiff’s employee. 2) On June 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) on June 12, 2013, prepared a letter stating that “I will not cause any injury to the Plaintiff either intentionally or negligently while using and performing the Plaintiff’s employee identification; and (b) if the damage occurs, I will entirely take the Defendant’s responsibility for civil and criminal matters (hereinafter “each of the instant letters”).

Since H’s renunciation of construction and the conclusion of the instant construction contract, H commenced the instant construction work, and around August 2013, as the construction was interrupted due to the delayed payment of wages to subcontractors, around October 2013, D prepared a letter of intent to waive the instant construction work to the Defendant-friendly D. (2) On September 27, 2013, D could no longer proceed with H’s work with the Plaintiff’s employee reduction on September 27, 2013.