beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly pay to the Plaintiff KRW 190,00,000 and the interest rate thereon from March 28, 2018 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant C worked as a brokerage assistant at the F Real Estate Office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul from June 23, 2009, and Defendant D served as a broker assistant from the H real estate located in Songpa-gu, Seoul from around 2011 to around 2013.
B. The Defendants committed fraud on October 18, 2012 by the Defendants: (a) around October 18, 2012, around October 18, 2012, the Defendants made a false statement to the Plaintiff to the effect that “Seoul Gangnam-gu I Dong will be developed as a site for the history of KSE (KTX). The Defendant C owned a vinyl house located in J and K, and purchased it in KRW 100 million, which would be entitled to receive compensation later; (b) However, even if the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu J does not actually exist, Defendant C was a parcel number of land number of which Defendant C traded to L on October 7, 2009, which was 80,000 won, and K was transferred to the Korea Rail Network Authority on May 30, 2012, and Defendant C did not have any authority to dispose of the said real estate and did not receive compensation from the Plaintiff even if it did not have any intent or ability to receive compensation from the Plaintiff.
3) On October 18, 2012, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendants with KRW 10 million as the down payment, and KRW 90 million in total, and KRW 100 million in total, under the pretext of intermediate payments and remainder payments around November 18, 2012. The Defendants committed fraud as of November 14, 2012 by the Defendants at the above licensed real estate agent office around November 14, 2012. The Defendants owned a vinyl house and Defendant C owned the said greenhouse house, which would not be able to see whether they were sold later, and live together with a lifelong food and drink.
2. However, in fact, the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government MM number was a lot number that does not actually exist, and the defendant C does not have any right to the vinyl house.