logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.22 2020나697
구상금 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

The grounds for appeal by the defendants are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and the fact-finding and decision in the first instance court are justified even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of this court's judgment is as follows, except for the following amendments and additions, and thus, it refers to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The third and fifth written judgment of the first instance court "Around January 11, 2017" shall be deemed "Around January 31, 2018".

Article 659 and "Article 659 of the Commercial Act shall be added in front of "performance guarantee insurance" in the fourth sentence of the first instance judgment (hereinafter referred to as "the fourth sentence").

After the fifth 16th judgment of the first instance court, “I have been found guilty of the crime of aiding and abetting the Defendant D, etc., which reads “(the Defendant D, by means of manipulating or demanding H to manipulate the results of active carbon test, etc.” (Fraud) and the judgment becomes final and conclusive, and H, as the crime of aiding and abetting the test result at the request of Defendant D, etc., which reads “I would facilitate the fraudulent conduct of Defendant D, etc. by manipulating the test result.”

Since the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, the defendants' appeal is dismissed.

arrow