A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

One excessive color (No. 1) seized shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:35 on March 1, 2013, the Defendant got off KRW 200,000,00,000, which is owned by the victim, from the victim D (M, 33 years of age) who used a cash withdrawal machine installed there, on the front side of the victim’s left side, by threatening the victim to “I wish to kill, I would want to kill, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to 20,00,00,000, which is owned by the victim.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of D (including the part of the E Statement);

1. E statements;

1. Records of seizure, excessive submission, and cash photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV photographs, photographs of the accused, photographs of the accused, and excessive photographs;

1. Relevant Article 334 (2) and (1), and Articles 333 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 33 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of applicable sentences: Imprisonment for a period of two years and six months to fifteen years;

2. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines (decision of types of punishment), the robbery group, the second category (special robbery) (special robbery) increased and mitigated factors: None of the relevant factors (Scope of recommendations): Three years to six years.

3. The crime of this case with the sentence of sentence is deemed to have been committed by the Defendant, using a deadly weapon, by suppressing the resistance of the female who had withdrawn cash at the time of the mixed cash payment at the night, and by force taking cash. The Defendant met around the crime of this case before and after the crime of this case, coloring the object of the crime, and against the defect that the victim's omission in the victim's shooting village after the crime of this case was attempted to arrest the Defendant, and thus, the crime of this case is highly poor and its nature and criminal circumstances are considerably poor, and the victim seems to have received considerable mental impulse due to the crime of this case.