Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The accused is a person engaging in driving service of Class C and 3 cargo vehicles in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act;
At around 23:40 on January 9, 2013, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.137% from the brea area to the Seoul bank, along with two lanes, the two-lanes at 230km points at the upper parallel line of the Coast Highway, west-si, west-si, west-si, west-si, west-do., the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.137%.
At night, despite the duty of care to prevent an accident by taking a person engaged in driving at night, the Defendant neglected to do so while under the influence of alcohol while neglecting the duty of care to prevent the accident. However, the part of the back of the E rocketing car driven by the victim D (V, 46 years old) who was driving around the Defendant’s running lane was the front part of the Defendant’s driving freight.
As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the climatic salt, etc. that requires treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, the Defendant, while destroying the climatic vehicle to bring about a considerable amount of 12,334,246 won, did not immediately stop the vehicle and escape without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim.
2. On January 15, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 700,000 won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Hongsung branch of the Daejeon District Court as of January 15, 2007, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for a year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court as of May 28, 2009.
On January 9, 2013, at around 22:30, the Defendant driven the above C truck while under the influence of alcohol of about 80 km alcohol concentration of about 0.137% from the roads near the drinking house where it is impossible to identify the name of Hongsung-gun red-gun, Hongsung-gun.
Accordingly, the defendant, who violated his duty not to drive alcohol more than twice, was driving under the influence of alcohol again.
Summary of Evidence
1..