A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 18, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and was issued by the Incheon District Court on August 28, 2013 a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime. On October 27, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for imprisonment with labor at the Incheon District Court for the same crime.

1. Around 13:44 August 29, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) operated the electric kickboard while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.264% of alcohol content from the 2km section from the place where the main fright-dong, Seo-gu, Cheongju to the front road of the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

2. The defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is the person engaged in driving the electric kick.

On August 29, 2020, the Defendant driven Kwikset with alcohol content of 0.264% during blood transfusion on August 13:44, 2020, and continued the front road of Cheongju-si B in front of Cheongju-si in front of Cheongju-si, with the shooting distance at the Gunam University Hospital, from the south Kwik-si.

At the time, the boomed road was milched and there was an intersection where signal lights are installed on the front side, so the driver had a duty of care to look at the front side and the left side well, to accurately operate the steering gear and the steering gear, to safely regulate the speed in advance, and to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so and did so, caused the Defendant’s previous kick kick, which was driven by C while in the front direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, to shocked off the back kick kick at the front direction of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed C’s vehicle by occupational negligence so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 461,746,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement C prepared by the defendant in court;

1. The principal driver;