logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.04.26 2013재고정8
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that “H, an employee of the Defendant, violated the restriction on vehicle operation at the military self-employed business office located in the 10km-dong line around October 17, 2003, a 17:26m-on-line 10km-line.”

However, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 193; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 8976, Mar. 24, 2011; Act No. 4920, Jan. 14, 2010; Act No. 8537, Mar. 4, 2007>

arrow