logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.05.13 2014고합17
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강간등)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 13:00 on March 18, 2012, at D restaurants located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (a) made the victim, who was a juvenile E (n, 17 years of age), was drinking with drinking water and was eating together with drinking water on the table table; and (b) made the victim’s buckbucks that were seated on the side of the victim, and forced the victim to commit an indecent act by force.

2. 피고인의 주장 피고인이 공소사실 기재 일시, 장소에서 손바닥으로 피해자의 허벅지 부위를 2회 톡톡 친 것은 사실이나, 이는 피고인이 혼자서 술을 마시던 중, 옆자리에서 술을 마시던 피해자 일행과 어울리기 위해서 피해자 일행에게 술과 음료수를 주문해 준 후, 합석하여 이야기를 나누다가, ‘(주문해 준) 술값을 계산했느냐’는 피해자의 질문에 ‘술값을 계산했다’고 말하면서 긍정하는 취지로 대답하면서 무심결에 한 행동으로서, 피고인에게는 강제추행의 고의가 없었다.

3. Determination

A. In a criminal trial of relevant legal principles, the finding of guilt ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads to a judge’s conviction to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, that the facts charged are true. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the doubt of guilt against the defendant is doubtful.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

B. (See, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Do8675, Mar. 9, 2006).

Judgment

피고인이 공소사실 기재 일시, 장소에서 손바닥으로 피해자의 허벅지 부위를 2회 톡톡 치는 행위를 한 사실은 인정된다.

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the Defendant cannot be deemed to have intentionally caused the victim’s bucks.

1) The background of the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant and the victim’s single-fluence and the victim’s single-fluence.

arrow