A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On October 2015, the Defendant violated the Narcotics Control Act (fluence) together with C, and around 18:00 as of the first day of October 2015, at the house of D apartment B 1010, C, and C, a local mental medicine medicine, divided one of them into two for a single-use divers and added approximately 0.05 g, each into two for a single-use divers, and then injected one for the remaining divers into C’ arms, and the Defendant injected one for the remaining divers that he received from C as above.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C to administer philophones.

2. On February 4, 2016, the Defendant violated the Narcotics Control Act (mariju) stored approximately 0.03g of hemp powder in the backside of the EX car owned by the Defendant, which was parked in the E-building parking lot in the original city around February 13:05.

Accordingly, the defendant possessed marijuana for the purpose of smoking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. Copy of protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the police; and

1. Copies of seizure records, copies of seizure lists, respective seizure records, and respective seizure lists;

1. Reports on internal investigation, requests for respective appraisal, and reports on investigation (the results of appraisal by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation);

1. Verification of the skin vehicle and measurement pictures of the weight of marijuana;

1. Collection: Investigation report (Additional Collection) and - Price of cancer transaction [the defendant and defense counsel, the defendant and defense counsel are not the defendant, but the defendant have been injected to the defendant's arms (in the case of the defendant's assertion, even if the defendant's assertion was made, the defendant was aware of the fact that philophone was involved in the injection period at the time of injection) and the possession of marijuana of this case was not known to the defendant. However, each of the evidence stated in the judgment, in particular, C police and prosecutor's office (the investigation record between 98 pages and 100 pages, 293 pages, 294 pages), and the criminal records of the defendant's crime.