The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

judgment of the first instance.

The reasons why our court should explain about this case are as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as the reasons why we should explain about this case are deducted from adding the following Paragraph (2).

The Plaintiff asserts that the fire-fighting systems or fire safety standards at the time of changing the purpose of use pursuant to the main sentence of Article 17(2) of the Enforcement Decree of the former Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25444, Jul. 7, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply) should be applied only to the part of which the purpose of use was changed pursuant to the main sentence of Article 17(2) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25444, Jan. 7, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply) since the alteration of the purpose of the warehouse of this case into sales facilities only the Plaintiff’s employees after changing the purpose of the warehouse of this case was planned to use the warehouse of this case.

Article 17 (2) of the former Fire-Fighting Facilities Act does not distinguish the main text and proviso, and provides that "where specific objects of fire service are altered," the requirements for the application of the provision are prescribed as the requirements for the application of the provision. In full view of the legislative intent of the Act to protect the lives, bodies and property of the people in critical situations, such as language, context before and after, and fire, etc., the above provision shall apply where the existing objects of fire service are altered only for all or some purposes while maintaining identity as a specific objects of fire service, and where the existing objects of fire service cannot be deemed to have changed only the purpose

However, the evidence No. 1 1, 6-.