A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

In a state where the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the on-site illness, in front of the Ecosmetic room operated by the victim D in Gyeonggi-do, 11:00 on May 1, 2017, in front of the Ecosmetic room operated by the victim D in Gyeonggi-do, 2017, the Defendant: (a) the customer who visited the beauty room “Isker, sker, male skin, and spawn are spats.

“In doing so, as they threaten customers to see drinking, they interfere with the victim’s beauty room business for about 30 minutes by force, such as threatening customers to see drinking, and preventing customers from entering beauty room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made in the police statement protocol with D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the closure of dynamic images;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 10(2) and (1), and Article 55(1)3 (Evidence Records 21, 34, 63 pages, etc.) of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2007No. 207Da1241, Apr. 28, 2017) (the grounds for sentencing) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007No. 2065, Apr. 28, 2017). The following factors are considered: (a) interference with the duties of a group of interfering with a crime, among the interference with the duties (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007No1241, Apr. 28, 2017) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e., Decision 2017Da1241).