The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years of suspended execution, confiscation, and burden of litigation) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, even if the Defendant did not have any criminal power and the Defendant recognized his own crime in the trial, the Defendant’s argument is not accepted (On the other hand, the Defendant’s argument that the part ordering the Defendant to bear the whole costs of lawsuit among the judgment of the court below is unreasonable, but objection to the judgment of the court costs is allowed only if there is no reason to do so, and this legal principle is not allowed, and it is not necessary to dismiss the Defendant’s appeal without any reason as to the judgment in the criminal procedure (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Do4759, Jul. 24, 2008). Thus, the Defendant’s appeal as to the judgment of the court below is without merit since it is no longer reasonable to reverse the judgment of the court below without any reason as to the judgment of the court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Do4759, Apr., 3).