The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) shall be excessively unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are that the Defendant’s confessions in the trial for the first time, and that there is no previous conviction, etc. are considered.

However, although the defendant was unable to repay as agreed upon by the victim because of the wind which makes it difficult for him to operate the main place due to his prepaid fraud, the defendant could have predicted that he would not fully repay due to the fact that he had a large amount of debt to other customers at the time of borrowing money from the victim, and was actually unable to repay the money after the fact that he did not actually pay the money after the fact that he did not use the money, and there was no effort to repay the damage or recover damage, and other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable, and the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.