1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of premise;

A. From January 30, 2012, the Plaintiff acquired, from Defendant B, the Plaintiff acquired at KRW 145,000,000 as premium, the Plaintiff acquired from Defendant B, and Defendant B paid KRW 145,00,000 in total, the sum of KRW 145,000,000,000 on the same day, from among the buildings that were leased by the said Defendant from Defendant C-friendly Association, “F buildings, a five-story building, a five-story building, a five-story building, a five-story building, a five-story building, a five-story building, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. Accordingly, on February 9, 2012, the Plaintiff leased the instant building’s singinging shop from the Defendant’s clan to February 9, 2012 by setting the deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 4,304,400, and the period of KRW 1 year from February 9, 2012 to February 9, 2013.

C. However, the instant building and its site on January 30, 208, when the Plaintiff acquired singing, respectively set the right to collateral security of KRW 9,100,000 with the maximum debt amount of KRW 9,100,000 and KRW 3,640,000 with the maximum debt amount of the said savings bank on September 15, 2010, respectively. However, each of the said rights to collateral security was transferred to the Korea Asset Management Corporation on the ground of the transfer of confirmed claim as of March 29, 2012, and thereafter, on April 30, 2012, the procedure for each of the instant buildings, etc. was initiated based on the Suwon District Court Branch G branch branch G with Sungnam Branch branch on April 30, 2012.

After that, the instant building, etc. was sold to the Residents' Credit Union on March 28, 2013 in the above auction procedure, and the said union rejected the succession of the lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant-Appellee.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B is the cause of the claim against Defendant B, and as follows, asserts the claim for damages arising from a tort and the claim for the return of premium pursuant to the premium agreement. A.

The plaintiff filed a claim for damages, the defendant B operated a singing room in the building of this case.