beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 그 업무에 관하여 사용인인 C으로 하여금 D 화물자동차를 운전하게 하였는바, C은 ㈎ 2007. 5. 22. 11:44경 남해고속도로 부산방향 부산기점 160.1km 지번에서 화물자동차 적정높이 4.2m를 초과하여 4.38m의 화물을 적재한 상태로 운행하고, ㈏ 2007. 6. 11. 17:14경 중앙고속도로 양산방향 부산기점 7.4km 지점에서 제한축중 10t을 초과하여 제5축에 11.19t의 화물을 싣고 운행하여 도로관리청의 차량운행 제한을 위반하였다.
2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Articles 86, 83(1)2 and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005 and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008; hereinafter the same) to summary order as to the facts charged of this case. The summary order subject to review is notified to the defendant. The Constitutional Court ruled in the decision of July 30, 2009 that "if an agent, employee, or other employee of the corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act in relation to the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under Article 83(2) of the former Road Act, and thus the legal provisions of the above Act retroactively lose its effect pursuant to the proviso to Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act.
If so, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.