logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.10.11 2018가합30238
서면사과 등 조치 무효 확인
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs were students who were enrolled in the first and second grades of H High Schools operated by the Defendant.

B. On December 13, 2017, the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence at H High Schools (hereinafter “Autonomous Committee”) (hereinafter “Self-Governing Committee”) provides that the Plaintiffs, a student of the same anti-school, (i) have been suffering from mental harm by continuing to work in the class of the first and second classes of September 1, 2017, together with his/her ship of his/her ship after the dispute (hereinafter “grounds for Measures 1”), and (ii) suffering from mental damage from external stress and open bathing from Pins North Korea during the period from September 8, 2017 to September 11, 2017 (hereinafter “grounds for Measures 2”); and (iii) have sustained from September 8, 2017 to the present day and suffered mental damage.

(1) On the ground that the Plaintiff’s special education under Article 17(1)1 of the School Violence Prevention and Countermeasures Act (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”) was conducted on the ground that (a) the head of HH high school made a written request to the Plaintiff for the victim under Article 17(1)1 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence, (b) the contact, intimidation, and retaliation against the victim student and the reported or accused student under Article 17(1)2 of the Presidential Decree, (c) the special education of the aggressor student under Article 17(3) of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence, (c) the special education of the guardian under Article 17(9) of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence, (d) the number of hours during which the special education of the aggressor student under Article 17(1)2 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against the Plaintiff, and (d) the special education of the aggressor student under Article 17(1)2 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence.

C. Accordingly, on December 18, 2017, the principal of H High School (hereinafter “H High School”) in the instant case.

arrow