Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 21, 2015, at around 01:10, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, on the ground that, upon receiving a 112 report that the customer would not count and take a bath to his employees, the police officer assigned to the police station DNA box sent to the scene would pay the drinking value; and (b) the Defendant, on the ground that he would pay for the drinking value, “breged a fake, Ga.” on the ground that he was the head of the above E’s chest part was boomed once by booming, brud by hand.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the control of crimes by police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each statement of F and E;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (in case of attaching a copy of work place);
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (it shall be taken into account the power to punish for the crime of violence, the issuance of a summary order due to the crime of injury immediately before the crime, etc. but the situation in which one's mistake appears to repent, the situation in which one's wife and two daughters are to support, and the details of his wife's wife's carbon);
1. The main sentence of Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act on Probation;
1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;