The defendant shall be innocent.

At around 11:30 on August 25, 2014, the Defendant, on the grounds that the Defendant violated the boundaries, was dissatisfied with the victim D who destroyed the steel will destroy the banner owned by the Defendant, and caused the destruction of the banner by double hand.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

On the other hand, the victim and his husband stated that the defendant assaulted the victim in the investigation process and in this court.

However, it is difficult to believe that each of the above statements is not consistent or consistent with each other's statements on the point of time when the assault was committed or on the specific contents of the assault inflicted by the defendant.

Meanwhile, according to the field photographs, etc. submitted as evidence, the victim's clothes on the day of the instant case are teared, and it is confirmed that the body of the clothes were flicked, but the victim was flicked. However, the possibility of suffering the body of the victim, regardless of the Defendant or in the process of destroying the banner, cannot be ruled out.

In full view of these circumstances, the evidence submitted in this case alone is insufficient to prove that the defendant has committed assault against the victim as stated in the facts charged to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.

If so, this part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, it is not guilty under the latter part of Article 325