logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.11 2016가단5117912
위약금 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company with the objective of an artist performance service and music performance business, etc., and the Defendant is a person with the nationality of Singapore, who is the Plaintiff on September 14, 2015, and the Plaintiff and a person with the nationality of Singapore “the Standard Exclusive Contract for Popular Culture and Arts” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant exclusive contract”).

The main contents are as follows: Article 2 (Grant, etc. of Human Rights) ① (Defendant).

hereinafter the same shall apply.

) A (the Plaintiff is the Plaintiff).

hereinafter the same shall apply.

(iii) activities as popular culture artists prescribed in Article 4 (hereinafter referred to as “entertainment activities”);

(3) With respect to entertainment activities under which A exercises exclusive authority during the contract period, the term of the contract, by itself or any third party other than A, may not negotiate, or engage in entertainment activities without the prior approval of A. Article 3 (Period and Renewal) ① The term of the contract shall be from September 14, 2015 to September 14, 202. ① All revenues derived from this contract shall be received by A, and shall be distributed pursuant to paragraphs (2) and (3) below.

arrow