1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff, as a member of C organization, served as a member attorney of D (Representative Attorneys E) from December 10, 2013 to April 2015.

In accordance with the direction of the attorney-at-law E of D, the Plaintiff had multiple meetings to be appointed in the Seoul detention center from October 2014 to March 2015. In particular, from October 2014, 2014, the Plaintiff had multiple meetings from October 1, 2014 to October 1, 2015. In light of the time of meetings, meetings with 10 minutes including where meeting hours are “0 minutes,” including cases where meeting hours are “10 minutes,” up to half of the total meeting number. In light of the time of meetings, meetings with the Plaintiff’s defense that the need for multiple meetings for basic fact-finding, preparation for examination of witness, etc., and (2) in the case of inmates F, G, H, I, etc. – except for weekend and legal holidays, where most of the necessary days for meetings are continuously interviewed without a day, while it is merely a case where the actual appointment was submitted, thereby undermining the dignity of the suspect and the attorney-at-law by seriously abusing the right to interview.

On March 22, 2015, 102 cases (5 cases), 50 hours and 41 minutes (135 cases (8 cases) 135 minutes and 28 minutes (20 minutes) February 16, 2015, and 137 cases (7 cases) 47 hours and 22 minutes (21 minutes) December 6, 2014, and 41 hours and 50 minutes (7 minutes) 11 hours and 22 minutes (1 minutes) 5 hours and 41 minutes (4 minutes and 50 minutes per case) 17 minutes and 150 minutes per case) 22 cases (4 minutes and 5 minutes per case) 5 hours and 14 minutes per case, and 13 minutes of disciplinary action against the Association (20 minutes) 13 minutes and 18 minutes per case, 2014.

The plaintiff filed an objection with the defendant seeking revocation of the above disciplinary decision, and on March 28, 2018, the defendant rejected the plaintiff's objection.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). [Ground for recognition] There is no dispute, and Nos. 1 and 1.