logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.06.28 2013고단1174
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A around August 16, 1993, which is an employee of the specific defendant in the facts charged, a violation of vehicle operation restriction on the front of the entrance of the Gyeongdo Highway located in Yangsan-si on August 6, 1993. 2. The penal provisions applicable to a summary order subject to review are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality (the Constitutional Court's decision 201HunGa124, October 29, 201, 201, 201HunGa38, 2010HunGa38, October 28, 2010, 2008HunGa17, which is decided July 30, 2009). Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow