The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving Kakn-knifs.

On December 14, 2012, the Defendant driven the above 08:00 on the 08:00, and led the front way of the construction site of the Obsong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, to the front way of the construction site of the Obsong-gun, Obsong-gun, the lower court proceeded bypassing two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the

Since the snow that had been previously moved was flicked, there was a duty of care to reduce speed and to accurately operate the steering and brakes. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to operate the steering and steering devices.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and led to the negligence of bypassing the road as it is, and caused by the ice ice, brought the right-hand bridge of the victim D(52 years old) who crosses the road from the right-hand side of the bend to the left-hand side of the bend side of the knife knife and parked in the front side of the knife knife knife, so the above victim's right-hand side knife between the above vehicles.

The Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the above victim to suffer from the above victim’s bodily injury, such as the ductal of the upper right side, the upper right side, the ductal of the upper right side, and the ductal of the front side, which requires treatment for about 23 weeks, thereby causing the victim to suffer from an incurable disease.

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant