Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the victim’s possession of a forest that was parked in the relevant area on the ground that, under the influence of alcohol in front of D main points located in C at 05:41 on August 24, 2017, the Defendant: (b) destroyed the Defendant by releasing the front glass of the FTT-ri vehicle, which is a dangerous object of the front glass of the vehicle owned by the victim, into the front of the D main point; and (c) destroying it by lowering it into the front documentary and hack pipe.

2. On August 24, 2017, at around 06:40 on August 24, 2017, the Defendant who damaged public goods was voluntarily accompanied to H district due to the same case as described in paragraph (1) within the H district of the Mado Police Station, G, which is located in G, and thereafter, the Defendant must enter the cell for the present time.

without any condition.

“Along with the fact that the police officers posted a computer monitor on the books in the said area, and laid the computer monitor on the books, and the police officer prevented the Defendant from doing his act, and again laid the telephone gate on the books on the floor.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged one computer monitor and one wire phone used in the H district of the macro-police station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E or I police officer;

1. On-site and damaged photographs, CCTV images, and photographs to take a visual image;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Articles 141(1), 369(1), and 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In the case of a defendant with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 62-2 of the community service order, there is a need for strict punishment because the same type of crime is repeated, and there is a need for strict punishment, and the defendant has already been subjected to suspended sentence over three times due to such type of crime.

However, the damage of property does not want to be punished against the defendant, and the defendant has damaged.