1. It is confirmed that the Plaintiff is a shareholder of the shares listed in the separate sheet between the Plaintiff and Defendant B.

2. Defendant.

1. Progress of this case

A. As the direct call center of D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) is closed, Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) entrusted a customer business information management right from D to a company established as a shareholder and operated as a D exclusive agency.

B. On May 31, 2018, 25 shareholders, including E, indicated in the column for shareholder list that was the shareholder of the 6,284 share shares of the Defendant Company, transfer each share (total 5,686 share; hereinafter the same shall apply) indicated in the number of shares in the attached list to the Plaintiff (hereinafter the transfer in this case), and the same year.

6.4.Departments;

8. The Defendant Company rejected the entry of the entry of the change of holders to the Defendant Company on 29.

On the other hand, the defendant company does not issue share certificates.

[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute. 2. The assertion and judgment of the parties to the claim against the defendant company

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff is a shareholder of the instant shares, so long as the Plaintiff notified the Defendant Company of the transfer of the instant shares, and that the Plaintiff is seeking the confirmation and implementation of the transfer process, as long as there is no provision that restricts the transfer of shares in the Defendant Company’

In the case of the defendant company for which six months have passed since the establishment of the foundation, the shares for which no shares were issued shall take effect if they are transferred in the same manner as the assignment of bonds. Therefore, the plaintiff shall have the status as a shareholder of the defendant company with respect to the shares in this case. Therefore, the defendant company is obligated to implement

In this regard, although the defendant company failed to limit the transfer of shares by a certified judicial scrivener, etc. in the process of the incorporation of the defendant company, the defendant company was an exclusive agency of D, and in light of the importance and meaning of DB's existence and business customer, there was an agreement among shareholders to limit the transfer of shares to a third party, and it transferred the shares of this case.