1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant Union is an association established to promote a reconstruction project of apartments in the first place, 1085 U.S., U.S., Gwangju Mine-dong.

On July 28, 2016, the Defendant Cooperative contracted the removal of existing buildings and the construction of apartment buildings to the Heung Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Jung Construction”). Heavy Construction removed obstacles to the apartment site, but the Defendant Cooperative decided to remove communications, electricity, water supply, and urban gas facilities.

B. On September 27, 2016, interesting construction subcontracted to the Plaintiff the removal of obstacles, ground objects, underground structures, etc. during construction supplied by the Defendant Union and the construction related to waste disposal (hereinafter “instant removal construction”).

C. On November 8, 2016, the Defendant Company contracted the construction of telecommunication, electricity, water supply, and urban gas facilities among obstacles to the apartment site to the Defendant Company.

The plaintiff from August 14, 2017 to the same year.

9. By no later than 15. Around 15., the Defendant Union and the Defendant Company sent an official letter to the effect that the Defendant Company would pay the relevant construction cost, as the removal of obstacles to the removal of the instant removal.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, Eul evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant Company removed the instant removal in lieu of obstacles to the removal of the Defendant Company.

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to the construction cost incurred by the Plaintiff due to unjust enrichment or administrative work management.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion by the Defendants is merely the removal of the instant case in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract after concluding the contract with Heung Construction with Heung Construction. Thus, the Defendants, not the contracting party, cannot claim the cost of the removal

C. Relevant legal principles 1 contracts.