Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On June 13, 2012, A was sentenced to a fine of three million won for the crime of inhaleting hallucinogenic substances in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch. Defendant B was subject to juvenile protective disposition on the same crime on November 8, 2007, and was in the same kind of force on three occasions. The Defendants are married. The Defendants conspired with the Defendants, around 03:00 on March 24, 2013, around 03:0, around 101 of the underground 101 in the Gyeonggi-si Group C of the Gyeonggi-si, the Gyeonggi-si, the Gyeonggi District Court: (a) held that the Defendant was in possession of an industrial fluorcco 150 grams containing hallucinogenic substances by dividing them into two plastic bags; (b) inhaled toxic chemicals into one part, and possessed them for the purpose of inhaleing toxic chemicals into the inputs of one plastic paper, and 47 cokes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on investigation, a seizure record, relevant photographs, a request for appraisal, and a written appraisal of hallucinogenic substances;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal records, etc.;

1. Articles 58 subparagraph 3 and 43 (1) of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution are allowed to have the same criminal records or the same criminal records, and in light of the contents of each of the instant crimes, there are circumstances unfavorable to the Defendants, such as the nature of each of the instant crimes and the very significant criminal records. However, the Defendants are not subject to the same criminal records and sentence beyond the suspension of execution, and there are no previous criminal records and sentence. The Defendants are in depth divided into each of their mistakes. The Defendants’ social ties is clear, and the detention of the Defendants entails excessive difficulties for their dependents, and the degree of their respective participation as co-offenders, such as the motive and background of each of the instant crimes, circumstances after the crimes, the Defendants’ age, occupation, family relation, health status, etc.