logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.09 2017가단25251
건물명도 등
Text

1. The Defendants shall deliver the buildings listed in the attached list to the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and the Appointeds D.

2...

Reasons

In addition to the purport of the entire pleadings as stated in the evidence Nos. 1 through 6, ① the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed Party D concluded a lease agreement with the Plaintiff (including value-added tax) to lease the instant real estate from June 25, 2016 to June 24, 2018 upon the completion of the registration of ownership transfer as Seoul Central District Court No. 3571 on June 7, 2010; ② the Defendants concluded a lease agreement with the Plaintiff to lease the instant real estate from June 25, 2016 to June 24, 2018 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”); ③ the Defendants paid 80 million won deposit to the Plaintiff, ④ the Defendants paid 10 million won to the Plaintiff by December 17, 2016; and ④ the Defendants agreed to withdraw the lease agreement with the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff by December 31, 207.

The instant lease agreement was terminated by agreement between the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Defendants.

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff (Appointed) and the Appointed D as restitution.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow