1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Grounds for claim;

A. The Defendant suggested to the effect that, on August 2013, the Plaintiff would make the Plaintiff registered as the primary subcontractor of Hyundai Spoon Line, the Defendant would modify the Plaintiff to the primary subcontractor of Hyundai Spoon Line on behalf of the Plaintiff, on behalf of the Jeju Ppoon Line, for the Plaintiff to register the Plaintiff as the primary subcontractor of Hyundai Spoon Line (hereinafter “Mopoon Line”).

B. The Plaintiff leased a factory to prepare for the actual inspection, purchased equipment, etc., and provided the Defendant with corporate cards and entertainment expenses, etc., in order to enable the same division to be registered as the primary subcontractor of the Hyundai U.S. P.S. Line.

C. Therefore, the Defendant should pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 151,843,03,03 in total, including the amount of KRW 25.3 million for factory rent, KRW 74,712,889 for the purchase of equipment, KRW 25,830,144 for the amount of corporate card used, entertainment expenses, KRW 26 million for the loss incurred due to the said deception, and delay damages therefrom.

2. Determination and conclusion-finding, the Defendant did not have any ability to register the Plaintiff as the primary subcontractor of the Hyundai Spoon Line, and the Plaintiff did not have any capacity to accept the Plaintiff’s false statement to the effect that “The Plaintiff will register the Plaintiff as the primary subcontractor of the Hyundai Spoon Line, instead of the Do and Jeju Do and Dong-dong, to change the Plaintiff to the primary subcontractor of the Hyundai Spoon Line,” the part of the evidence No. 5, the witness B’s testimony is difficult to believe, and the fact-finding results of the fact-finding on the Hyundai Spoon Line Co., Ltd. of this Court are insufficient to recognize the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

(A) If the plaintiff asserts, the plaintiff suffered a large amount of fraud from the defendant, but the plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against it, etc. Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is not reasonable.

Then, the plaintiff's objection.