logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.11.25 2016가단23874
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 47,94,788 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from May 3, 2016 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. In full view of the Plaintiff’s assertion, as a whole, subparagraph 1-1 of the evidence No. 1 to subparagraph 6-6 and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff continued to supply steel products to the Defendant, who operates B, from September 4, 2012 to March 25, 2015, and the Defendant of Appellant at KRW 58,994,788, the amount unpaid as of May 29, 2015, paid KRW 5 million to the Defendant on June 15, 2015, and sent a written statement to the Plaintiff to the effect that the Defendant would pay KRW 500,000 to the KRW 5 million from June 30, 2015 each month, but the Defendant actually paid KRW 6 million thereafter.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 47,94,788 won in balance of the steel product price (58,994,788 won-5,000,000 won-6,000 won) and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from May 3, 2016 to the date of complete payment.

2. The defendant's assertion argues that the remaining amount, excluding KRW 8,179,787, out of the amount the plaintiff seeks, is not the defendant but the price for the goods supplied to the Sung comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd.

However, according to the facts acknowledged above, it is recognized that the amount claimed by the plaintiff is the balance of the steel products supplied to the defendant, and there is no evidence against this, and the fact-finding results applied by the defendant also do not go against

Therefore, the defendant's argument is not accepted.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and acceptable.

arrow