logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.30 2016가합504433
채권조사확정재판에 대한 이의의 소
Text

Seoul Central District Court on December 30, 2015 authorize the final claim inspection judgment 2013 Ma2140 dated December 30, 2015.

The costs of lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 6, 2007, the defendant is a housing association established with 341 members of the association in order to promote a housing construction project (hereinafter “the instant project”) with the members of the C Headquarters as a project implementation district. The wide area of the corporation (hereinafter “large area”) is the defendant’s execution agent, and the central construction company (hereinafter “central construction”) is the contractor.

B. Since the process of the establishment of the instant project, broad areas of the project carried out the tasks such as securing the project site and inviting union members. In the process of promoting the instant project, the demand for refund of union membership fees and pressure on repayment of the principal and interest of existing creditors became difficult rapidly due to the lack of financial circumstances. (ii) To secure the business and operating funds, a loan amounting to approximately KRW 180 billion is granted under the guarantee of the central construction of the contractor from April 2007 to February 2008 under the guarantee of the contractor from the central construction of the contractor. On the other hand, in order to secure the business and operating funds, a member who withdraws from the association or renounces the sale of an apartment unit to transfer the so-called "share of the unit" to an unqualified investor. At the same time, the apartment unit was sold to the investor at approximately 60% of the purchase price of the apartment unit and, instead, the apartment unit was collected in advance in the form of the project being carried out.

3) The wide area of the instant project was conducted on behalf of the Defendant on December 5, 2008, with the approval of the housing construction project on June 26, 2009, with the completion of the construction report completion certificate, etc. However, around June 2010, the central construction, a contractor, entered the workshop, and the instant project was completely discontinued. (C) The Plaintiff concluded a contract on October 2, 2007 with its members’ preferential payment and deposit (hereinafter “instant advance payment contract”). The main contents are the instant advance payment contract.

arrow