logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.05.26 2017고합48
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강간)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) accessed the victim D (n, 15 years of age) (hereinafter “E”); and (b) divided the conversation with “E”; (c) falsely concluding that the victim wishing to talk with his body “to arrange a model model for having the victim receive free of charge,” and (d) provided a video call, such as the victim’s chest, bucks, bucks, etc., using a video call, if deemed necessary for the model line.

Around that time, the Defendant had expressed a mind to have sexual intercourse by threatening the victim, “to spread his body image separately by recording it.”

1. Around December 28, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Protection of Children’s Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (compact) said, “E” means that “The Defendant sent to the victim all visual images exposed, so he/she would spread to the place where he/she refuses to meet, which would allow him/her to talk with, leave him/her so that he/she can talk with his/her chest, and leave him/her with his/her inner organ as soon as possible.” On December 31, 2016, the Defendant led the victim fageed to the passenger room inside “G” 10 stories at Sinpo-si Ftel 10 stories at Sinpo-si.

Then, the Defendant, showing a threatening speech and attitude, exceeded all the clothes of the victim, and was sexual intercourse by inserting the sexual organ of another defendant listed above the body of the victim who is far from continuous intimidation into the body of the victim once.

Accordingly, the defendant raped the juvenile victim.

2. From around 12:00 on December 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had sexual intercourse with the victim as described in paragraph (1) above; and (b) taken the Defendant’s mobile phone camera, she saw the victim’s telegraphic shock from his/her bath room, after having sexual intercourse with the victim, as described in paragraph (1) above; and (c) taken the Defendant’s mobile phone camera.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation and shame against the victim's will.

3. The Defendant of intimidation.

arrow