beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. The Defendant School Foundation B shall be annually from April 20, 2008 to June 26, 2015, as well as KRW 551,820,798.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Status 1) Defendant School Foundation B (hereinafter “Defendant School Foundation”)
(2) The Seoul Special Metropolitan City School Safety Mutual Aid Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Mutual Aid Association”) is a corporation established to carry out projects for the prevention of school safety accidents and fund increase pursuant to Article 15 of the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents (hereinafter referred to as the “School Safety Act”), which is a corporation established to carry out projects for the school safety mutual aid for the prevention of school safety accidents and the promotion of funds, and which is a school safety mutual aid operator to which the C Middle School Head has entered.
3) At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was a second grade student of Cmiddle School, and was a student belonging to the leading department. (b) On April 20, 208, the Plaintiff: (a) around 11:30, the Plaintiff was a student of Cmiddle School, and around April 2008, the Plaintiff: (b) around 4 leading teachers including D, a guidance teacher for the leading department at Cmiddle School, which belongs to the Defendant School Foundation, provided a free practice of attack and defense against the Plaintiff, who was a high school student, as part of the training for the Elebrative conference scheduled to start up to the next day. Furthermore, during the Plaintiff’s attempting to engage in the Plaintiff’s arms and kneing technology against F, the Plaintiff’s head was divided into the Plaintiff’s body into the Plaintiff’s head, and the Plaintiff’s salmbling was caused by this accident, and the Plaintiff suffered damage to the Plaintiff’s head, salvating, and the instant accident (hereinafter referred to as “damage and damage”).
At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff asserted that F, who would have glick technology to F, had glick the Plaintiff into the floor by force, had glick the Plaintiff up to the floor. However, each of the statements in the evidence Nos. 6 through 8, which seems consistent, is difficult to believe in light of the evidence Nos. 3-1 through 3, and witness G’s testimony, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.
In addition, the defendant school juristic person is the plaintiff at the time of the accident of this case.