logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.23 2014고단5639
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 11, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on May 26, 2014 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on May 26, 2014

around 04:54 on July 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with a 1,300 gallelebing equivalent to KRW 1,300, a victim’s market price within the convenience store operated by the victim D in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul; and (b) committed a theft.

"2014 Highest 7376"

1. Larceny;

A. On August 2014, 2014, the Defendant stolen the thief, 11:00 on a lower order of August 2014, 201, with the victim G in a warehouse for the F apartment recycled in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Seoul”)’s disuse of KRW 1,000 in the market price occupied by the victim G.

B. On September 17, 2014, around 16:35, 2014, the Defendant stolen the thief, with one breab in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,000, at the convenience store located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, the victim I occupied.

2. Interference with business;

A. On September 8, 2014, around September 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 20:30 on September 8, 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the needy customers who had drinking alcohol on the tables installed in front of the convenience store operated by the victim D in Dongjak-gu Seoul, Dongjak-gu, Seoul; (b) had them go to another place; and (c) had them go to undergo a disturbance for about two hours, such as drinking alcohol in that place and drinking sound.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the convenience store business of the victim by force.

B. On September 11, 2014, around September 23, 2014, the Defendant, at around 23:00, obstructed the business of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 23:0, 201, asked the victim K to perform alcohol at a finite room operated by the victim K, which was rejected, and provided a bath for the Defendant’s refusal. In short, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as following the tables installed in front.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

3. Damage to property;

A. On July 22, 2014, the Defendant who destroyed and damaged property on July 22, 2014: (a) around 02:00, the foregoing Article 2-A.

The victim D's market price in front of the convenience store in the subsection C is 30.

arrow