1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 93,983,200, Plaintiff B’s KRW 4,865,00, and each of the said money from January 15, 2014.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Authorization and public notice of a private investment project - The second connecting highway C (hereinafter referred to as the "instant project") - The defendant: D public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on March 19, 2010, D public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on April 13, 2010, E public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on March 4, 2013;

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on November 21, 2013 - Each land owned by the plaintiffs (hereinafter “each land of this case”) and each obstacles indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each obstacles of this case”) as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the above land of this case”) - Compensation for expropriation: KRW 951,382,70 for Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff clan”) and KRW 346,576,600 for Plaintiff A’s clan (hereinafter “Plaintiff clan”): As to the claim for compensation for damages due to a decrease in the price of remaining land of the Plaintiff clan, it shall be confirmed that there is no price reduction for each land of this case as indicated in the separate sheet owned by the plaintiffs: The date of commencement of expropriation shall be the Appraisal Board Co.,, Ltd. (hereinafter “Appraisal Board”) and the Appraisal Board Co.,, Ltd. (hereinafter “Appraisal Board”) for the appraisal of Plaintiff A’s clan.

C. The court's entrustment of appraisal to the first appraiser H (hereinafter "the first appraiser H") - Compensation for losses: 960,471,300 won for the plaintiff clan, 351,441,600 won for the plaintiff clan, and 351,441,600 won for the plaintiff clan - With respect to the claim for compensation for losses due to a decrease in the price of the remaining land of the plaintiff clan: It shall be determined that there is no price decrease for the remaining land of this case.

The result of this Court's entrustment to the second appraiser I (hereinafter "the second appraiser of the court" and "the second appraiser of the court") - The result of the appraisal entrustment is due to a decrease in the price of the remaining land of the plaintiff clan.