Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's punishment (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, and forty hours of sexual assault treatment) against the defendant against the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor argues that it is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the circumstances that are favorable to the defendant, including the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, the fact that the defendant did not keep or distribute photographs and did not cause secondary damage, and that the defendant again committed the crime despite the fact that he was detained by the suspension of indictment for the same kind of crime as the crime in this case. The victims who taken the face from the toilet to the scene of the crime in this case, and the extent of the victim's sense of shame was not good in light of the method and consequence of the crime in this case, etc., that are disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the circumstances and contents of the crime in this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be too heavy or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.