All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On February 5, 2017, Defendant 1 did not err by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine) and interfere with one’s own business operations, and the Defendant properly resisted the measures for unfair discharge, etc. of the D convalescent hospital, and did not intentionally interfere with the duties of the victim.

However, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged and erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

B) The Defendant was forced to commit an indecent act did not have the victim’s chests twice, and there was no intention to commit an indecent act by force.

However, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged and erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

C) Although each assault against the victim N and P did not know water at a restaurant operated by the victim N, the Defendant did not blick the victim N, or did not blick the victim P.

However, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged and erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

2) The Defendant was physically and mentally weak at the time of committing each of the instant crimes.

3) The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

B. On February 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) led to interference with one’s own business on February 23, 2017; (b) led to the confession of this part of the facts charged at the lower court; (c) took a bath while protesting against the unpaid hospital expenses at the time; (d) extracted the heavy metal from the moving bed; or (e) assault the security personnel he/she prevented.

However, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of this part of the facts charged erred by misapprehending the facts.

2) Each injury means that the degree of the type of injury that the Defendant used to the victims is not somewhat weak, each injury diagnosis report prepared by the doctor L is reliable, and even if the victims did not receive treatment after the issuance of the above injury diagnosis report, such circumstance alone causes victims.