The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one-year imprisonment) is too unreasonable as to the gist of the grounds for appeal.

2. The judgment of the court below that the defendant's act of committing the crime of this case is advantageous to the fact that the defendant recognized all of his own crime in the trial, and there are many records of the same crime including seven times of punishment, and the crime of this case is committed during the repeated crime period. The criminal records of repeated crime and the records of punishment for the crime of "2016 Highest 706" in the judgment of the court below are very similar to that of the court below. The risk of repeating the crime of this case is very high, since the crime of this case was committed under the above several methods, the Incheon-gun, Incheon-gun, Yan-si, Yan City, and permanent residence, and it is not good that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, it was not agreed with the victims, and there was no effort to recover the damage, and other various factors of sentencing as shown in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, environment, sex, family relationship, motive and circumstance before and after the crime, it cannot be accepted the defendant's allegation that the sentencing of the defendant is unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.