The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (two million won suspension of sentence) is too unfilled and unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant, a short-term doctor, was requested by the staff of the Health Insurance Review Evaluation Institute to respond to an investigation as to whether the collection of expenses for medical care (medical care) was appropriate, it did not refuse such request without any justifiable reason, resulting in disruptions to the operation of health insurance and medical insurance, but the quality of the crime is not good. However, the defendant is a first offender, and the hospital operated after being subject to a disposition of business suspension for a period of one year is operated, and thus, the defendant's economic loss is reasonable, and the defendant's economic loss is also reasonable, and the defendant has been in a salary position at another hospital. Considering other various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, motive, means, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, family relations, etc., the prosecutor's assertion is not unfair, because the court below's excessive punishment is too uneasible and it is not justified.

3. The appeal by the Prosecutor is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.