logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.08.10 2016고단341
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 15, 2015, the Defendant was a person who is engaged in driving CFD car, and was driving the front road D at the time of leisure at around 01:40 on December 15, 2015, and was driving the said car into a ethic ecological tunnel bank from the roadside surface of the leisure market.

At night and at the same time, the center line of yellow domin lines is installed, so a person engaged in driving service has no duty of care to make a U-turn at the point where a U-turn is permitted, even though the Defendant neglected to do so, and neglected to operate the vehicle to the right side because the vehicle was not in the center due to the negligence of a sudden internship beyond the center line, and the Defendant operated the two-lanes of the victim's G-cab in the victim's G-si, who proceeded with the two-lanes from the ecological tunnel of the evis ecological tunnel, to the surface of the irrigation channel, was in front of the right side of the Defendant's vehicle.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury, such as the necessary salt field requiring medical treatment for about two weeks, and, at the same time, destroyed the 1,404,00 the said taxi and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged person by stopping the taxi immediately.

Summary of Evidence

Application of the police statement report, actual condition investigation report, accident scene, vehicle photograph photograph photograph photographic examination report, and written estimate to F of the defendant's legal statement

1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the point of escape after occupational injury) and Articles 148 and 54(1) (the point of non-measures after accident) 2 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime, Articles 40 and 50 of the same Act concerning the ordinary concurrent crimes;

3. Selection of an alternative fine;

4. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

5. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant, even though having caused an accident, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the nature of the crime is not weak.

However, the defendant.

arrow