The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) from Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu B and 303 around 07:52 on February 2, 2016, the Defendant would incur a full payment of the fee to the victim C (V, 22 years of age) who had been used for transfer to someone else.

In doing so, “I are able to find a death at present”, and they are themselves.

How much money you want to die even if you give money.

(y) At present, the males of Thailand were met, and it was called to find a width.

“To make cell phone Kakao Stockholm messages and make intimidation by transmitting them to the victim’s cell phone.

B. On March 27, 2016, the Defendant died when attending the victim’s meeting at the same place on March 27, 2016.

The governance dies when it comes out of the name of Nininland and A.

"In this way, intimidation was made in the same manner as the preceding paragraph.

(c)

피고인은 2016. 4. 10. 07:30 경 부산 남구 D에 있는 E 호텔 번호 불상 객실 내에서, 그전 피해자에게 연락하여 안부를 물으며 ‘ 자신이 운영하는 노래방을 그만두고 피해자와 같이 옷가게를 운영하자’ 고 제안하여 이를 의논하기 위해 피해자를 만난 후, 피해자에게 성관계를 요구하였으나 이를 거부당하자, 이전에 사귈 당시에 사용하였던 데이트 비용을 갚으라며 객실에 비치해 둔 물과 음료수를 피해자에게 뿌리고, 피해자의 뺨을 1회 때리는 등 폭행하였다.

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Articles 283(1) and 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Articles 283(3) and 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The records show that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on May 13, 2016. Thus, the prosecution against the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.