Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 11, 2014, at the office operated by the Defendant “E”, the Defendant received a request from F to keep at least 1 kg 50,000,000 won in the market price of 2.5 billion won, which he stolen from the Defendant’s office in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and received a request from F to keep at least 50,000,000 won, while knowing that the stolen was an stolen, the Defendant kept the stolen property by leaving 50,000,000 won in a personal rental bank located at the location of the Korea Telecommunication, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, from September 11, 2014 to September 19, 2014.

2. Around September 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a request from F to sell 10 dud 10 out of 50 dud dud 50 in a car parked in the said “E” parking lot; and (b) requested from Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G and H in 603 on September 19, 2014 to arrange the transfer of stolen goods by requesting for purchase of 10 dud dud 10 at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and H;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Protocols concerning the examination of suspects of public prosecution against F, J and H;

1. The investigation report (H mobile phone analysis result in H) and the investigation report (the recognition of stolen goods in the crime of stolen goods is not required to be a conclusive recognition, and it is sufficient to have dolusent recognition to the degree of doubt that stolen goods might be detected. Whether the stolen goods were known or not should be recognized by taking into account the identity of the stolen goods possessor, the nature of the stolen goods, the transaction cost, and other circumstances (see Supreme Court Decisions 99Do3590, Sept. 5, 200; 2004Do5904, Dec. 9, 2004). The above statement is made by the Defendant with respect to the appearance, appearance, quantity, market price, and cash transaction of the peld, F's acquisition circumstances.